Sunday, November 04, 2007

Running Record


Week# M. T. W. T. F. S. S. Total kms
1 Sep 3 12 0 12 12 8 0 0 44
2 Sep 10 12 0 12 12 8 0 18 62
3 Sep 17 12 0 12 12 8 0 0 44
4 Sep 24 10 4 4 0 0 0 0 18
5 Oct 1 12 0 12 12 8 0 0 44
6 Oct 8 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
7 Oct 15 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 12
8 Oct 22 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
9 Oct 29 12 8 12 12 4 0 0 48
10 Nov 5 0 4 6 0 12 0 4 22
11 Nov 12 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
12 Nov 19 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
13 Nov 26 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
14 Dec 3 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
15 Dec 10 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
16 Dec 17 8 8 12 8 8 0 0 44
17 Dec 24 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 24
18 Dec 31 8 0 0 8 8 0 0 24
19 Jan 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10
20 Jan 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10
21 Jan 21 8 12 4 8 8 0 0 44
22 Jan 28 8 12 4 8 8 0 0 44
23 Feb 4 8 12 4 8 8 0 0 44
24 Feb 11 8 12 4 0 4 10 10 48
25 Feb 18 8 0 4 0 4 0 0 16
26 Feb 25 8 12 4 8 8 27 0 67
27 Mar 3 8 8 8 0 8 0 0 32
28 Mar 10 8 12 4 8 8 0 29 69
26 Mar 17 8 8 4 8 8 0 0 36
27 Mar 24 8 8 0 8 8 0 0 32
28 Mar 31 12 8 8 0 20 0 0 38
29 Apr 7 12 0 8 8 0 0 30 54
30 Apr 14 12 8 12 8 12 0 30 72
31 Apr 21 12 8 12 8 12 0 33 75
32 Apr 28 12 8 12 8 12 0 33 75
33 May 5 12 8 12 8 12 0 38 80
33 May 12 12 8 12 8 12 0 0 52
34 May 19 8 8 8 8 5 0 42 79 <-- Saskatoon
35 May 26 0 8 8 8 8 0 0 32




Questions without Answers

Monday, October 01, 2007

Empires

The world is flat. much as it was for the first explorers setting up "trade routes" with far away countries.

The only difference is multi-nationals are the new empires sending explorers to bring back the vast labour riches of far-away lands.

Expanding to areas of the globe where the only rules of business are "might is right". SEC and corporate audits and GAAP just don't fit with being globally competitive.

Some countries line up to do business with the conquistadors, to acquire the bounty that is being spent on expansion, others are enlisted less voluntarily by the multi-national turned wanna-be global empire.

Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Staying Between the Ditches

Staying between the excess and the deficiency is the way to a balanced and happy life. This is the virtue or the "Golden Mean" according to Aristotle, and is like saying that the way to a happy and sucessful trip is staying between the ditches.

Sunday, August 19, 2007

Free Will and Salvation

Free will exists without question outside the area concerning righteousness. As Dietrich Bonhoeffer puts it, “we are free only against God” ( Ethics ). But looking back at more foundational Christian Fathers, Saint Augustine goes much further in his response to Pelagius as do Martin Luther and John Calvin a little later.

In their mind, it is completely out of bounds to accept that mankind could play ANY active role in acquiring salvation as this would clearly be works based salvation. Therefore God working though the Holy Spirit is the only one who works in us to set up the correct conditions for salvation. Luther is adamant on this subject in his tirade against Erasmus, “we can endevour to do no good”, referring specifically to this subject of being saved. ( Bondage of the Will )

However, God is clear that he offers us a free gift and it is ours to accept. ( Rev 22:17, Ephesians 2:8, Romans 5:15-17 ) God delegates directly to us the responsibility ( i.e. freedom ) of accepting or rejecting his gift of eternal life. Yes it's true that we can do nothing to earn God's gift, but on the other hand we can not be compelled or forced to accept it against our will. It would be neither free nor a gift if we had no choice in accepting it

Augustine and Luther argue that references in the Bible stating our responsibility to act does not imply our ability to act. In fact moral obligations simply serve to make us aware of how incapable we actually are of meeting our moral responsibilities.


The difference I would maintain between what I am poorly trying to state and what Luther and company are stating is that when they speak against Pelagius and Erasmus of earning righteousness or endevouring to earn righteousness, they are speaking of outward acts such as baptism, or doing good deeds. This is very well and true, however, as we learned from Jesus in many of his teaching moments, righteousness wasn't about doing good or being baptised or keeping the law or any outward acts; it was about the purity of the mind first and foremost. That is to say, acting out of a position of love as opposed to obligation when obeying the law and doing those good deeds. As an alternative, I would describe the initial saving faith in Jesus as a completely inward and personal orientation, not requiring outward acts.

I maintain ( against Martin Luther, John Calvin, etc.. ) that we can, and should, and do endevour to believe ( align our free will with God's truth ) that Christ is Saviour and thus accept our otherwise unearned gift. It is this inward act, this endeavour of the will to recognize its own bondage, and then plead for release that “open's the door” and earns us our “free gift.” Confessing Christ as Saviour out of obligation or pre-destination would not mean anything in the sense of John 3:16, as it would not be possible to cooerce someone into believing something that they simply didn't believe.

My humble apologies to Saint Augustine and Martin Luther, but I think there is plenty of room for mankind to recognize it's sorry state and to confess our universal need for a Saviour out of our own free will without having to compromise on our completely sinful nature or the fact that on our own we can do nothing to earn our salvation. In addition, lets put responsibility back where it belongs. God has already done everything he needs to do, it is now up to us to reciprocate.